I live in a swamp and my best friend is a talking donkey.

In response Sea Shells to her Publication

i believe these are used to test the machines and not used on people.

Proud Deplorable, I love my country, love my President, love the great state of Texas! πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡²πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡²

In response Sir Shrek to his Publication

A) they are packaged identically B) I'm sure the swabs are identical. How do they know if some sleepy worker accidentally puts positive into negative or these swabs are remotely close to the testing ones? Do the testing ones look like these ones? This is bad if for no other reason than it brings up questions. I've said all along they contaminated people with the virus.

I live in a swamp and my best friend is a talking donkey.

In response Tina Griffith to her Publication

maybe. But these aren't test kits for people. They are supposed to be used to calibrate the machine and test for accuracy.

like calibrating a PH probe. You use test samples close to the range your seeking to monitor. Either a sample known to be 4 and 7 or 7 and 10.

In response Sir Shrek to his Publication

Only people mentioned by @ShreknD in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Sir Shrek, click on at the bottom under it