The argument isn’t about if Pretti was allowed as a legal carrier to have his firearm in his possession at the protest. It’s about his behavior, knowing he was armed and still acting like a clown to instigate a reaction. It’s about his responsibility as a permitted individual to declare the gun during initial contact. It’s about not having his id or permit with him. It’s about the choices he made. Not about having a weapon at a protest. They’re blurring the line on purpose. His choices that day do not equate to Rittenhouse defending property with open carry. They want to fudge the narrative with false equivalence. Stay the course of truth. No matter how much they try to drift it.