In response Boooo BooBoo to her Publication
Provides rules for enemy occupation of a US territory, provides for rights of domestic inhabitants of enemy occupied territory, and provides conditions for termination of occupation. Given circumstances, it is fathomable DC is an occupied area of an enemy combatant. While we've had no declaration of war, I'm not certain it's impossible to prosecute there matters as though there are enemy combatants present as indicated by election irregularities, etc.
But DC is also a territory right?, not a state so it would be a territory take over and be govern by this law correct?