I find it also that they've all been taught the "talking points" about Charlie Kirk. The same items taken out of context, by the handlers that spoon-feed their followers their daily 4 AM spoonfuls of hate-filled rhetoric!

I read a story yesterday, where a person decided to go read the actual dialog, watch the videos, etc., and commented that they could not validate what they were told.

I's like how Fulton J. Sheen years ago said: “There are not one hundred people in the United States who hate The Catholic Church, but there are millions who hate what they wrongly perceive the Catholic Church to be.”

That;s the paradigm we are in: the left using Alinsky tactics creates false scenarios to attack opponents, and in the process, their handlers (Liberal, barking moonbats on the left) whip their base into a frenzy with "fake" information!

I got into arguments with college professors in the mid 1970's. For economics, I argued about points counter to socialism, and I was asked how I got my information. I told him I read newspapers, and his comment back to me was that I was not supposed to know about "that stuff". That told me he wanted a clean slate to imprint HIS ideology. Luckily, the class was large and he never got my name, and I played his game.

For grammar and composition, my professor graded on political content, not on sentence structure, nor grammar! I learned to play his game as well.

The social misfits from the 60's found tenure at universities, and that's what got us to where we are today: snowflakes, taught "Alinsky's Rules for Radicals", and to yell, scream and throw temper tantrums when they can't comprehend a logical discourse that is counter to what their professors taught them as their "Version of Truth", according to the progressive Left's ideology.