Hold the line is at 9.412.10%, let's get this done!! #WWG1WGA

This is what I believe is going on, read the rest in the comments. 👀

Majority of people commenting on Epstein files have no concept of irregular warfare and only see things on a surface level. It’s understandable to be upset but put emotions aside and think logically. Epstein was a front for a foreign entity that entrenched itself into the highest echelons of US institutions, installed proxy cartel/terror cells all over and is holding the world hostage with the Samson Option, so this transcends a standard DOJ criminal case into an existential national defense scenario for the military — meaning it’s ongoing, and clandestine in nature. NucIear weapons made kinetic warfare between powerful states near impossible. This is the age of information & irregular warfare and if it were ever to happen between former ‘allies’, they’d keep up normal diplomatic relations for the public.

Q has been proven hundreds of of times to be a legitimate backchannel to the public, if you take the time to look. You don’t have to like it, but it’s true. If you don’t study the material, you will continue to remain in the dark.s/1841979643722924350?s=46 Q was a backchannel from Military Intelligence and NSA, that targeted the ClA/M0SSAD and the RothschiId mafia who controls them. (Anyone claiming the 4chan hack revealed Q to be M0SSAD is spreading a fake story from a doctored screenshot ) That’s why Snowden was activated to attack the NSA and not the ClA, despite spending his entire career as a ClA agent. Q was talking about Epstein’s temple years before Trump had him arrested, before most even knew there WAS a temple. Trump is who took down Epstein, Ghislaine, Brunell, Bronfman, Nyguard, Mack, Raniere, NXIVM etc- all connected — and HUNDREDS of chiId. He’s an expert at trolling the media into covering an issue he wants them to spotlight. He’s done this for Q proofs before

In response mark kub to his Publication

Only people mentioned by @markkub in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from mark kub, click on at the bottom under it