the movie is complicated. FBI was a serious spot to be in. i am not sure he would fool around with that one over lesser.. but you never know.. we shall see, at this point nothing is certain.

Well said Ingrid.
Why are we debating all of this when we don't know the workings behind what we're being shown?
Look here, not there, white psyops, black psyops, sting ops, misinformation, disinformation, trolls and perhaps a few honest truth telling people.
So why debate? Seems silly even though I do join in. UGH!

If not this then it has ALL been a F'n LIE.....Openness, accountability, and honesty define government transparency. In a free society, transparency is government's obligation to share information with citizens. It is at the heart of how citizens hold their public officials accountable. So no showy no believe-y

You cannot have full transparency when people are running psyops on the population. Who is behind the going to war with China story? I have no idea, but I suspect somebody is looking into it. If people want more information then they will have to quit entrapping and exploiting people for their own reasons. EM provided a great service for the world with opening up Twitter to X, however it is also looking likely some of the psyops on people are running through there. I do not blame EM for that. He provided a tool and if people used it for nefarious things they need to be identified and sorted. You do not take the tool away because people exploited it, that would be bad business practice. Car companies would have closed long ago if that was how it worked. Same with hotels, resorts, and other venues where people got up to shady business.