#France#Notre_Dame et son prince đŸ€Ź
La#flĂšche de Notre-Dame dĂ©truite dans l’incendie a Ă©tĂ© remplacĂ©e par une autre flĂšche Ă  l’identique; alors que les#vitraux conservĂ©s des chapelles sud, intacts, seront eux remplacĂ©s

Lors de l’incendie qui a ravagĂ© la cathĂ©drale de Notre-Dame le 15 avril 2019, sa flĂšche s’est effondrĂ©e, infligeant Ă  l’édifice la plus grave de ses blessures, un stigmate qui marquera son histoire. Le mot vient de stigmi, en grec, qui veut dire l’instant, c’est-Ă -dire l’éternitĂ©. La flĂšche a Ă©tĂ© remplacĂ©e Ă  l’identique... VoilĂ  que M. Macron choisit de faire son «geste» lĂ  oĂč il ne faut pas, commanditant des vitraux contemporains pour remplacer ceux de Viollet-le-Duc, situĂ©s dans les chapelles sud, qui sont intacts... M. Macron n’a-t-il pas entendu parler de la Charte de Venise, signĂ©e par la France en 1964? Elle impose de maintenir ce qui est intact lors d’une rĂ©novation de bĂątiments anciens...
https://www.letemps.ch/opinions/chroniques/notre-dame-et-son-prince

Only people mentioned by @sylviefourcade in this post can reply

Trump 2020, Fight Like a Flynn ⭐⭐⭐, WWG1WGA, Seth Rich, God Wins đŸ™đŸ», We Are The Storm 🩅, God Bless America đŸ‡ș🇾

In response Sylvie Fourcade to her Publication

“During the fire that devastated Notre-Dame Cathedral on April 15, 2019, its huge spire collapsed, inflicting the most serious of its injuries on the building, a stigma that will mark its history
 The arrow has been replaced identically.”

“Mr. Macron, who wanted to commit an "architectural gesture", could have seized the opportunity to sponsor a contemporary work that, by its simple existence, would have recalled the drama of April 15. Now Mr. Macron chooses to make his "gesture" where it is not necessary, ordering contemporary stained glass windows to replace those of Viollet-le-Duc, located in the south chapels, which are intact. Where History should have been marked, he ignores it. Where he should have respected it, he erases it.”