Notice: Undefined index: url in /home/admin/www/v2.anonup.com/core/components/post.php on line 471

Notice: Undefined index: url in /home/admin/www/v2.anonup.com/core/components/post.php on line 475

Notice: Undefined index: url in /home/admin/www/v2.anonup.com/core/components/post.php on line 479

Notice: Undefined index: url in /home/admin/www/v2.anonup.com/core/components/post.php on line 483
Carole Davis-Z

Oera Linda | Fyodor Dostoevsky | Lao Tse | Mehran Keshe | Q

In response Rompt Theodoor to his Publication

What documents?
Where?
I am fed up with these "Anons" making statements and never backing them up.
In future i will be regarding them as propaganda unless supported by evidence and or links.
Enough of this already!!!

Oera Linda | Fyodor Dostoevsky | Lao Tse | Mehran Keshe | Q

In response Juris Prudence Civilis to her Publication
In response Rompt Theodoor to his Publication

According to Wikipedia:

(now tell me Wikipedia is fake!!!)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gateway_Pundit

US LEGAL resident alien, WWG1WGA, Out of Darkness into Light. Tallyho!!

In response Juris Prudence Civilis to her Publication

Wikipedia can be written or edited by anyone...

Apparently this entry was composed by a far left nazi, going on the premis that 'telling a big enough lie, often enough makes it the truth...'

In response Carole Davis-Z to her Publication

OK, lets say I believe you, what evidence do you have of who did write it?

'telling a big enough lie, often enough makes it the truth...'
What/ like calling fake news, fake news often enough makes it fake?
You`re argument is groundless unless you can show me evidence to the contrary.

US LEGAL resident alien, WWG1WGA, Out of Darkness into Light. Tallyho!!

In response Juris Prudence Civilis to her Publication

Show me evidence this was written by a reputable source.

In response Carole Davis-Z to her Publication

If you check out the bottom of the page, there are 123 "references"as to the validity of the article written.
Each reference, has a link that corroborates what is written.
THAT is the validity of the Wikipedia page.
perhaps you missed that bit , easily done, if you don`t read the entire thing.

None of those references are reputable, they just parrot the original premise.

Kind of like factcheckbook quoting snopes... or, its own factcheckers

In response Juris Prudence Civilis to her Publication

Only people mentioned by @Tallyho in this post can reply

In response Carole Davis-Z to her Publication

Yep, a resource is only as Reliable as the Foundation it was given birth.
Either its from the Foundation of TRUTH or the Lie Premise.
One's Worthy the other not.

Brings to mind 'false witnesses' - they can be many, but if they're just branches of a corrupt vine or tree, they're valueless.