does the Declaration of Human Rlghts supersede the American Constitution
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the U.S. Constitution serve different purposes and have distinct scopes of authority. Here's a quick overview:
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR): Adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948, it's a milestone document that establishes fundamental human rights to be universally protected. However, it is not legally binding.
U.S. Constitution: This is the supreme law of the United States, establishing the framework of the government and fundamental laws. It is legally binding within the United States.
In terms of legal authority, within the U.S., the Constitution takes precedence over the UDHR because the UDHR is a set of guidelines rather than enforceable law. However, the principles in the UDHR often influence U.S. policies and laws, promoting the protection of human rights.
Mongrel jew Lincoln was, a Rothschilds agent.
America was lost at the signing of the Constitution, an amendment to the Articles of Confederation
I wouldn't disagree with you on this point.
Most of those in positions of power were only there by virtue of co-ercion, corruption and manipulation.
Such is the weakness of the human soul.
