Only people mentioned by @JacksRule in this post can reply

In response Truth Seeker to his Publication

Well, I think it's cute.
The 'idea' or thought of it.
Even though it's not on the up and up. :)

it's saddening that we shrink and get all wrinkly, but that's the result of the fall - being spiritually disconnected from GOD and have a sin nature that needs quickening and transformation (reconciled unto God via The Son).
We weren't meant to live 'on this Earth and in this fallen world forever' so that's the way it is.

Serving Jesus, minister of the Kingdom, pursuing the Greater Awakening, MAGA, WWG1WGA, 2nd A, Is 60 and Hab 2:14! I'LL FOLLOW BACK

In response Truth Seeker to his Publication

She could be their grandmother for sure NOT their mom.

Serving Jesus, minister of the Kingdom, pursuing the Greater Awakening, MAGA, WWG1WGA, 2nd A, Is 60 and Hab 2:14! I'LL FOLLOW BACK

In response Truth Seeker to his Publication

This is TOTAL BS!
No woman in 1954 EVER WORE PANTS AND dressed that way. Maybe in 1994 or possibly even 1989 but if 89? those 2 boys would be 36 or so which they clearly are not.

In response Truth Seeker to his Publication

women didn't dress that way in 1954.

We share very few sentiments with our government.

In response Truth Seeker to his Publication

Those guys are 70+? I'd guess the photo on the left was from 1974 looking at the mom, but those guys don't look 50+ either.

Child of God, mother of two, retired R.N. Proud to be an American! God bless the USA!

In response Pike Bishop to his Publication

I am guessing the mom is 1954. The boys could have been born late 80's???

(1) Show this thread