Copied from another platform, a 'spiritually-based' page:

In the timeless allegory of The Matrix, Morpheus poignantly reveals a fundamental truth to Neo: "You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so iniured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it." This statement captures the essence of the divide between those who have chosen the proverbial red pill, seeking truth beyond the veil of illusion, and those who have taken the blue pill, opting to remain comfortably ensconced within the boundaries of the illusion.
For those who cling to the illusion, it is not merely a belief system; it is their entire reality. The illusion offers a sense of security, identity, and belonging, even if it is built upon falsehoods and half-truths. To question it would be to unravel the very fabric of their perceived reality, leading to a profound existential crisis. (cont'd in comments)

In response Rebel MacB to her Publication

Thus, they defend the illusion with fervor, often employing the very tools that the illusion has given them: division, labeling, and attack.
Those who have seen beyond the curtain, who have dared to take the red pill, understand the deeper workings of this dynamic. Awareness becomes their guiding light, not just an awareness of the illusion itself but also an understanding of the forces at play within those who still inhabit it. The red-pill taker sees the world not through the narrow lens of left or right, conservative or liberal, but through the broader spectrum of consciousness, where such dichotomies are recognized as tools of control rather than genuine differences in belief or ideology.
(cont'd below)

The defenders of the illusion, bound by their blue-pill choice, will often resort to ad hominem attacks, labeling, and other forms of divisive rhetoric. These are not acts of rational discourse but rather reactions born from fear—fear of the unknown, fear of the collapse of their constructed reality, fear of the abyss that lies beyond the comfortable lies they've accepted. They may call you names, brand you with labels, or dismiss your perspectives as dangerous or heretical, not because they have critically engaged with your ideas, but because to do so would require them to confront the uncomfortable possibility that their world is not what it seems.

In response Rebel MacB to her Publication

Only people mentioned by @BornRebel in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Rebel MacB, click on at the bottom under it