Oh NO shit!😱
Tesla's bad! Very bad.
Omg! Do you get it now????

What was fresh is now rotten Long since gone but never forgotten

In response Yankee Carolyn to her Publication

Can you elaborate any further? I know a lot of his inventions were stolen

If you don't mind, please click on my little avatar to get to my page and see my last few posts about this topic. It's how electricity can reanimate the dead, and it starts with Mary Shelley's premise for her book Frankenstein's Monster. I'm sorry, it's hard for me to back track, I'm posting exactly as I dig and discover. Please do, you'll see what I'm lacing together.

Observing the frauds and laughing at fools. DNH, TNS; ZFG

In response Yankee Carolyn to her Publication

It's not the premise for Mary Shelley's Frankenstein both she and Lord Byron were extremely clear about it. Actually, the rabbit trail you've followed is a wild goose chase created by the one person who swore to ruin Tesla... Thomas Edison. Probably should research first, then validate through several sources, then post.

In response Valkyrie Queen to his Publication

what are you talking about? i show it. and i don't appreciate your advice to censor myself

Observing the frauds and laughing at fools. DNH, TNS; ZFG

In response Yankee Carolyn to her Publication

You showed nothing but opinions from others - nothing that can be verified as fact. Show comments from Mary Shelley herself about the premise for her story. You won't because it would destroy your little story here. I didn't say anything about censoring - I simply advised you to get some facts first.

In response Valkyrie Queen to his Publication

i have facts.
if you don't like my thinking, fine, scroll on.

I have no opinion on your thinking. What you call facts are unsubstantiated ramblings from neonazi trolls who lurk in the dark web. Of course, you're free to buy into their delusions.

In response Yankee Carolyn to her Publication

Only people mentioned by @ValkyrieQueen in this post can reply

In response Valkyrie Queen to his Publication

Furthermore, I then (using my own mind) considered this remarkable application of electricity that had been ongoing AT LEAST since the 18th century by well known scientists who, by virtue of working with ELECTRICITY as Nikola Tesla had famously done, would not most likely have escaped HIS notice.
Tesla was an ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, a very astute one, so how he could get where he was and know what he knew without knowing about Volta, Galvani, Dippel or Aldini is unthinkable.
That would be like a painter in this day and age not knowing who Leonardo DaVinci was.
Given what Tesla had to have known, IN MY MIND, makes his intentions to create a "World Wide Wireless" communication network suspicious, and in light of the book of Revelation's prophecies.

I have not gotten any ideas from anyone but myself

and, I am proud to put them out there for all to see

Who the fuck said I had to be as tight as Encyclopedia Britannica to share a fucking trail of thoughts on an open platform?

Observing the frauds and laughing at fools. DNH, TNS; ZFG

In response Yankee Carolyn to her Publication

If you are truly proud of your thinking - then you should not be offended by a challenge to it nor should you get upset when being asked to explain it.

(1) Show this thread
In response Valkyrie Queen to his Publication

the cruxt of what i was showing is that scientists beginning with Galvani in the 1700s successfully used electricity to re-animate dead animal parts and then a dead human.
Shelley used this idea of electro-stimulation as the premise for what would animate Frankenstein's monster and she was aware of Dippel's experiments with this. She had visited Switzerland and gone to the real Frankenstein's Castle where Dippel performed such experiments, and then named her character after that castle.
These are all connections I have made by reviewing the FACTS that
• Shelley went to Frankenstein Castle
•Shelley named her character after the castle
• Re-surrection technologies using electro-stimulation were factually, historically performed at said castle.

I'm not interested in the literary endeavors of Shelley. I am interested in the interests of occult sciences which are not popularly shared overtly with the general public, but found in truth and fact by looking.

Observing the frauds and laughing at fools. DNH, TNS; ZFG

In response Yankee Carolyn to her Publication

Cruxt? Ok, whatever. Also, Wikipedia is an open-source site and has not been considered a reliable source for decades. Information doesn't cross-check... your logic is flawed.

Shelley MAY have visited the castle.
Shelley was not involved in the occult sciences - she wrote the story as a challenge from Lord Byron. Lord Byron wrote a similar story yet you've not mentioned it once. Also, there was no connection possible between Shelley and Tesla. Shelley died five years before Tesla was born.

If you want to raise awareness of the sciences - fine.... but use facts and not supposition.

(1) Show this thread