No she does t

https://youtu.be/LE3S_UlgC_s?si=KK2-cXVk3AUnkR9v

From the gov web site - for whatever reason AU will not let me post it as a reply to a comment, so I have had to copy the text from it instead.

"Constitutional requirements for presidential candidates
Candidates for president of the United States must meet basic requirements. Learn about the criteria to run for president.

The U.S. Constitution states that the president must:

Be a natural-born citizen of the United States
Be at least 35 years old
Have been a resident of the United States for 14 years
Anyone who meets these requirements can declare their candidacy for president. Once a candidate raises or spends more than $5,000 for their campaign, they must register with the Federal Election Commission. That includes naming a principal campaign committee to raise and spend campaign funds."

"The fact that Senator Kamala Harris has just been named the vice presidential running mate for presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has some questioning her eligibility for the position. The 12th Amendment provides that "no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States." And Article II of the Constitution specifies that "[n]o person except a natural born citizen...shall be eligible to the office of President." Her father was (and is) a Jamaican national, her mother was from India, and neither was a naturalized U.S. citizen at the time of Harris' birth in 1964. That, according to these commentators, makes her not a "natural born citizen"—and therefore ineligible for the office of the president and, hence, ineligible for the office of the vice president."

Natural born means born on American soil, not naturalized

The anchor babies of illegals are natural born US citizens - this is why they come over while pregnant.

That baby has all the rights of a US citizen... including being eligible to run for Pres once 35, and sponsoring their entire bloody family in, legally..

Harris is eligible because she was born on American soil.

I suspect they will kill her off, because Hildabeast is still salivating in the wings, to start WW3 with Russia.

That was meant for slaves and slaves alone. Not every foreigner or illegal who has a baby on American soil. They were not American citizens at the time of her birth therefore nor is she. The "law" (constiturion) has been raped, pilaged and plundered by Marxist globalists, just like everything else. She is not eligible. Nor was Obama.

Fraid not.

If you are born on US soil, you are considered an American citizen.

"Birthright citizenship, or jus soli, is the principle that a person born in a country is automatically a citizen of that country. The United States is one of 33 countries, including Canada, that recognize citizenship based on place of birth. (We also recognize citizenship if one is born to a U.S. parent, regardless of where the birth occurred, under certain circumstances.) The concept of birthright citizenship was not always the case in the U.S. but became the law of the land with the ratification of the 14th Amendment. The Constitution now requires that:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside."

https://www.scu.edu/ethics/all-about-ethics/birthright-citizenship-for-everyone-born-on-us-soil-is-the-law-of-the-land-/

In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original “organic” version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. With the “Act of 1871,” our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word “for” was changed to the word “of” in the title. The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner:

“The Constitution for the united states of America”.

The altered version reads: “THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”. It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not.

https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/when-the-united-states-became-a-corporation/

Uh, ok.

But, despite the status of the Country, the Constitution still demands a person be born on US soil to be eligible.

It says NOTHING about their parents.

However, countries like Qatar, DEMAND that to be a citizen, not only must you be born in Qatar, but both parents must be citizens too (and the only way to be that is to be born in Qarar).

America understood that it relied on foreigners to populate the continent - George Washington was born in England (visited his ancestral home in Sulgrave many years ago), but they also realized that the highest office must be held by someone without divided loyalties, brought up in the American way.

They also recognized that a child, once adult is not subject of the parents, and should not be constricted by their birth place, so regardless of the parents nationality, the child, born in the US, is eligible to be President.

I hate Harris as much as any of that goon gang, I doubt 'she' will be inaugurated.

My mother was born in London to an American Father and British mother. She had to choose, at 21, what citizenship she was to be although she lived on US soil for 20 years and her father was Born here. Neither of Kamala's parents were citizens. Anchor baby is a false corporate BAR designation.

Kamala was born in Oakland CA, so fills the criteria of being born on US soil.

I still cannot find a reference that mentions parents in relation to the Pres candidacy.

As you were born on foreign soil, but to a US citizen, you got the choice, if your mother was foreign, but father was American he would have had to prove he was your father, for you to be able to claim citizenship, after being born in a foreign land.

A US citizen woman who has a child abroad, does not need to prove parentage, obviously.

I agree, the Corporate rules, are not the original rules, but I cannot find the original rules regarding the Pres candidates parents status.

The problem is with the definition of Natural Born Citizen. Being that neither of her parents were "citizens" of the US she can not be " natural born" just because they were here geographically. That would give any enemy or illegal every right of US citizenship and access to the Highest office on all the land which is exactly what happened with Obama and now Kamala. The exception was only meant to be granted to children of slaves.