Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/admin/www/v2.anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 1


Notice: Undefined index: owner in /home/admin/www/v2.anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 36

Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /home/admin/www/v2.anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 36

Notice: Undefined index: owner in /home/admin/www/v2.anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 37

Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /home/admin/www/v2.anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 37
Only followers of this user () can see their posts

They've been trying to destroy the Druze (Jesus) bloodline for centuries. Humans started out with 12 strands of DNA we are now down to 2... people better shake awake already

Jesus was not his name, real name at birth Esu Immanuel! Summary of Esu Immanuel's genealogy: Esu Immanuel's birth mother, Mary, was not Jewish (Judean), she was a Galilean. Galileans were descendents of the Sumarians, having migrated from Sumar to Galilee. This great lie that both Mary & Immanuel were Jewish (Judean, Hebrew) was perpetrated some 2,200 years ago by the Hebrew Elders of that time & has been continued by their ancestors until this very day. Archangel Gabriel was Esu Immanuel's birth-father. He was/is a distant descendant of the Sons of Heaven, Rasiel, who was the guardian angel of the secret. According to Divine Plan, Gabriel secretly inseminated Mary with his own seed, thus becoming Immanuel's birth-father. Esu Immanuel, was therefore, both Galilean (a descendent of the Sumarians) from his mother Mary, & the Son of a distant descendant of the Sons of Heaven, from his birth-father Gabriel. Immanuel, therefore, was NOT "Son of God" nor was he "King of the Jews".

In response Michele Q17 to her Publication

Only people mentioned by @ShineBright9 in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Stevie King, click on at the bottom under it