SCOTUS WILL BE FORCED TO LOOK AT AND REVIEW ELECTION FRAUD EVIDENCE ON FEBRUARY 19TH. IT'S LITERALLY OVER FOR BIDEN!

>Donald Trump v Pennsylvania SoS
>Lin Wood v Georgia SoS
>Sidney Powell v Michigan SoS

>https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docket/docketfiles/html/public%5C20-845.html
>DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.

Only people mentioned by @Christine28 in this post can reply

A mother, wife and pet owner. I Love nature, pro life and striving to be the best version of myself. We are all connected. Peace ❤️

In response Christine CLH to her Publication

part2
Chief Justice John Roberts either has to sit this one out (apparently the delay from January 22th - original date of SCOTUS conference - is because one of the supreme judges is personally implicated in the case and would not be able to do his job in a neutral way), which would mean the others could do their job without Roberts' corrupt influence OR Roberts has to actually acknowledge election fraud. Either way, after February 19th the supreme court of the United States will NOT be able to claim ignorance to election fraud. If they do, every single NATO member should just quit NATO, bec

A mother, wife and pet owner. I Love nature, pro life and striving to be the best version of myself. We are all connected. Peace ❤️

In response Christine CLH to her Publication

part 3
because being in a military alliance with a banana republic is not a smart geopolitical decision, to say the least.

So what do these cases mean?

When the transparency of the vote counting process had been blocked in a certain voting district, the results of that district ought to be audited. Audit =/= recount. They will actually check each vote (reminder that they only need to check the votes cast in districts where poll watchers/vote counters have sworn statements that they had seen illegal practices) and see if the person behind those votes is real or not. This is where many o

(1) Show this thread