This is a great lesson but is slightly different than where we are at right now. These kids were given a clear cut dilemma; disobey an authority figure to save the fish.
Anons are willing to disobey authority - up to a point. For anons to take the step beyond information warfare and political action they need one more thing:
Certainty.
Certainty of a clear and imminent danger.
Or certainty of the guilt of a specific perpetrator.
We have neither currently.
We know that the jabs are dangerous and can avoid them but is mRNA now in the food supply as Tom Renz claims?
We know the main players responsible for the jabs but we are uncertain of whether the individual in front of us is an actor or body double.
If you saw Gates at a restaurant, would you be certain enough that it was really him and that you have enough evidence to perform a citizen's arrest?
Even if Q posted again, we are uncertain, and a moral person will hesitate to take a permanent action without c
A major deterent is seeing daily the
freedom and prospouring of evil ones
and then seeing when someone steps
up for good it is jail time or death, or
if one brings evidence on something
it just fades away--who would have
our backs in the 'citizen arrest' of an
evil one, even if it was someone that
attacked a daughter or wife