😻 I admire the Brunson Brothers’ tenacity
& dogged determination. Prayers up 🙏🏻🕊

#AmericanHeroes

🇺🇸 Juan O Savin
Do Oaths mean something?
The question is, with SCOTUS,
do they want to take a chance
on wiping out the whole system? 💥
BRUNSON v ADAMS
is a case against 385 persons in Congress
+ Biden, Harris & Pence.
The people named in the suit
voted to certify the 2020 Election.
A group led by Sen Ted Cruz
had asked for a 10-day review to determine
whether the Election had been attacked
as an Act of War
by outside forces to affect the outcome.
Congress did not take the 10-days to review..
The fact that congress certified the vote
WITHOUT VERIFYING
meant they didn’t protect
the citizens’ Constitutional Right
to fair representation.
This is a Treasonous act.
THE REMEDY IS
THEY CAN NO LONGER HOLD OFFICE ⚖️

https://twitter.com/BrunsonSCOTUS

https://t.me/BrunsonBrothersSCOTUS

SCOTUS letters
https://brunsonbrothers.com/scotus-petition/

Here are facts Kat.
BAR members need emoluments for their positions, they do not have Emoluments, as they are all bound to the Crown Temple BAR.
BAR members are suppose to be bound to the Constitution.
Obviously Trump, military has done something, choosing judges that follow the Constitution to some level, making better decisions.
The Judicial branch does not have authority to interpret law like the Brunsons are telling people.
The Legislative branch does not make law, law is laid down and declared.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQHPS3flM_s&t=359s

Emoluments Violations under Brady - YouTube

Why "Brady", and what does it have to do with "Liberty Interest", and or "Policy" of all things? Good questions to have in your mind as you watch this presen...

In response Kat istheSea3 to her Publication

Only people mentioned by @physics171 in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Law & Physics, click on at the bottom under it