Juan O Savin

17 is the BOOK OF ESTHER & VICTORY to God’s people.
17 is the death & resurrection date of Osiris who THEY worship.
#’s are CRITICAL to THEM in EVERYTHING they do.
THE MOST POWERFUL of all THEIR secret organizations
is Yale's Skull & Bones.
Skull & Bones’ super-secret magical # is 322.
The mirror of 322 is 223.
We’re coming into a 223 year / 0 doesn’t count in Gematria.
When Hillary DIDN'T win in 2016
IT THREW ALL THEIR TIMING MARKS OFF
& they’ve been trying to get their whole machine
back into Time & FAILING.
They’d planned
-a nuke for Seattle
-catastrophic financial collapse
-BITCOIN → $3 million
-the switch to digital everything..
& 2023 is that year WHERE ALL THEIR PLANS
HAD TO COME TOGETHER
& it’s ALL about to come off the rails for them.
IT’S GOING TO BE BIBLICAL
BECAUSE THE WHOLE THING FLIPS IN AN INSTANT.
Even the Brunson case coming on J6
sets a tone for this next whole year—WHATEVER HAPPENS.
Have Tribunals begun?
Yes 💥

Thanks Kat, Happy New Year! Did you see this article? I wondered if you had seen this? They of course, did not mention Juan, only jumped all over the Brunson family with very negative remarks that people have no clue how the US Constitution works. I never heard of that lawyer, Barnes either. Terrible.

https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/12/30/the-truth-about-the-brunson-case/

unfortunately, the constitution has failed. even in its strictest form, it is just a piece of paper , and literally everything the USA government has done since it was written is unconstitutional. there have been at least 200 years of usurpation and even with this long train, we are not even close to performing our duty to overthrow such government.

this is no valid basis to have any government or laws. there has never been a time in USA history where the benefit of having a government has outweighed the costs. not even one day.

The Constitution hasn't failed us. We've only neglected to make it work for us. When we learn again to make it work for us and seek the courage needed to enforce our God-given rights, we will then see just how well the Constitution actually DOES work for us.

we are the answer, not the constitution. you are right about that. it is just right versus wrong. we can stand up to evil with or without the constitution.

my point is the answer is never courts. courts are barbaric and corrupt.

the answer is simply saying no despite any consequences

Remember that the Constitution was designed to represent the interests of the people and to guard the rights the founders rightfully declared came from God Almighty and while I do concur that our hopes should never be fully placed in courts to properly administer justice, we still in principle must give them an opportunity to do what is right and sometimes they do and sometimes they don't.

And I will concede this much that inasmuch as the Constitution has been instrumental in keeping tyranny at bay and has been a constant hinderance to it, we cannot always rely on it to oppose evil for men have opposed evil and have triumphed over it even before there ever was an America or a Constitution, but the power that we must rely on for us to steadfastly oppose evil is that power which comes from God Almighty just as others before us have relied on His delivering and sustaining power to confront, fight against, and eventually triumph over the forces of darkness.

i think we have been in tyranny since middle ages. i do not think it ever got better. it just got hidden by brainwashing

Since that first tax levied on peasants, so the lords could go to religious/political war...

Prior to that, in the Bronze Age, people grouped around a chieftain, and fought only to protect their lands and possessions, the only thing they gave was their time (and sometimes, their lives.)

Rather than the peasants being giving their lives in support of the chieftain to protect their tribe, the chieftain is seeking to take their lives BUT not in defense of the tribe. Talk about irony.

I do not think a Chieftain sought the lives of his followers, more they fought direct threats to their lives from outside - those stealing livestock, those trying to steal women and children, those seeking to move in on the land already settled, water proximity and ease of access being some of the things they would have fought for.

The outsiders could be tribes moving, due to changes in weather or landscape (over grazing, change in migration routes of food animals, drought etc) to marauding peoples from far away (like the Romans and then Vikings - using the UK as an example).

The difference is, that these were direct, tangible threats, you could see coming from your abode.

The Middle Ages was the start of the wars of dogma (and power), that the peasants did not have a reason to fight, other than they resided on the land of someone who 'decided' they had to pay taxes to fund a fight, typically in a land far away (France, The Holy Land etc).

It's a historical comparision between Chieftains protecting their tribe outside threats v. our "chieftains" seeking our demise with the assistance of outside threats. That's all.