Believer/Christian APL 99.993 I've seen war 1st hand + more child suffering than most.
@SarahCorriher
Parler is suing Amazon to force it to continue offering service against its will. Would you want to continue giving Amazon money at that point? I don't really understand companies which sue other companies in order to force them into an unwanted business relationship when the unwilling party wishes the destruction of the other. Business relationships are supposed to be both voluntary and mutually beneficial, so why attempt to force another company into taking your company's money when it is plotting the demise of yours?
Believer/Christian APL 99.993 I've seen war 1st hand + more child suffering than most.
Back when conservatives were more gutsy, they used to argue against the Civil Rights Act, which forced businesses to serve all races. The argument was (in part): Why would you want to continue giving the racist store owner your money anyway, if you were a black man? The Civil Rights Act forced store owners to serve everyone, but should you even want to patronize someone who inherently hates you? I wouldn't want to support (with my purchases) a black-owned business if I knew that the owner hated my race, for example. That happens, by the way.
That is what Parler is doing. The answer is not forcing our enemies to take our money. The answer is providing competing services and thereby destroying those enemies with the same kind of financial starvation that they have attempted to inflict upon us. Money truly is power, and you're voting to give someone else power every time that you use it. Maybe the solution is that we stop giving it to them.
