More about state national.
Remedy is Due Process of law to get the relief demanded.
Relief from financial coercion.
Relief from criminal attacks, crimes taking place, trespasses of rights.
Expose election fraud, to being justice.

Clarity on differences between Lawful and legal.

The Brunson case, further review.
Has the courts made any errors?
writ of certiorari
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/writ_of_certiorari

Kirks sharing the Brunson case has lack of standing, the case is not being served to the proper place, the Brunson case is to go to the Legislative branch of government.

Foundations of LAW comes from our rights and there is a science of LAW that is used to protect our rights, there are too many rights to list them all.

LAW schools teaches Code, Code pleadings, LAW schools are not teaching the truth of LAW.

Can you petition a de-facto legislator?

https://rumble.com/user/KirksLawCorner
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gAzLL7l0IY

Elections are political and may only be adjudicated in THE LEGISLATURE not in any US court as they have no subject matter jurisdiction.

Saw reference to this before which for me begged the question why the SC clerk pushed for Brunson to lodge the case twice (reported)?
it's all getting so confusing lol.

I heard Loy say something to the effect that it had to be a judge that was instructing the clerk, the clerk would not just take action by themself.

yes exactly.
Somehow feel it's all highly significant. Juan gave lots of gen on this in his interview with Meri Crouley on Rumble - just finished listening to it.
This is the link if you would like to hear what he says
https://rumble.com/v1yih78-juan-o.-savin-with-intel-on-supreme-court-brunsom-case-and-president-trump-.html

Three branches of government.
Legislative
Executive
Judicial.

Doesn't make sense why Juan is Referring to Three branches being legislative, administrative and judicial as that is not true.
Maybe Juan is referring to corrupted aspects of government as administration (an unlawful process), as the fake courts are administration courts treasonous, not what a confederate republic is all about.

Election fraud is a political argument, what Kirks law corner is sharing, is the case is to be served to the legislative branch of government.
Kirk's Law corner points to evidence of process, factual information.
Doesn't seem like Juan communicates about natural or common law aspects.
Solutions, problem solving is essential to humanity, using Due Process of LAW to protect our foundational, fundamental rights.

Who is teaching people what their rights are and how to defend the rights of each other, of everyone?
Seems to be there is lacking wisdom for how to align with a natural flo

Thought Juan meant "administrators" of those behind them pulling strings? so yes, corrupted. Kirks Law did a more thorough job of sticking to the Law aspects. Juan's comment about SC protecting themselves against fallout from RoevWade was interesting.
Until the MSM falls the average person is not being told truths
this we know.#knowledgeispower
we also know people have been deliberately kept ignorant of their rights. the info is out there but the rat race most ppl are in make it difficult for them to stop to think n that been going on a long time.