(...)"Whom ever is navigating these storms and waters with us, we are aboard, and on deck, because alas~ WWG1WGA" ~R
(...)"Whom ever is navigating these storms and waters with us, we are aboard, and on deck, because alas~ WWG1WGA" ~R
we have frequencies to harm and to cure, [they] kept us in a trance so to speak with these frequencies, yet gratitude,love, truth (++)bursts that away, checkmate! beam of light activated from within and is yet another trap set for [it] hahaha Man makes plans god laughs
xx
(...)"Whom ever is navigating these storms and waters with us, we are aboard, and on deck, because alas~ WWG1WGA" ~R
xxoo
———- Forwarded message —————
From: Lynn Forester de Rothschild
Date: Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 7:15 PM
Subject: FW: Elizabeth Warren To: “Cheryl Mills (cheryl.mills@gmail.com)”
I think this blog overstates what Warren was doing, but we need to craft the economic message for Hillary so that Warren’s common inaccurate conclusions are addressed.
Xoxo Lynn
(...)"Whom ever is navigating these storms and waters with us, we are aboard, and on deck, because alas~ WWG1WGA" ~R
What Didn’t Happen
What didn’t happen is this: there was no dissent in the scientific profession about taking guidance and money from a convicted pedophile who was obviously trafficking children for sex. Not a word. At every stage of this repellant saga, from Epstein’s early forays into scientific patronage twenty years ago through his conviction for child prostitution in 2008 to his largesse as a patron of elite Darwinists and computer scientists at MIT, Harvard, the Santa Fe Institute, the transhumanist project Humanity Plus, and many others in the decade that followed, there was, from the scientific community, abject silence.
(...)"Whom ever is navigating these storms and waters with us, we are aboard, and on deck, because alas~ WWG1WGA" ~R
blackmailed, or they are [them]
locally,nationally and internationally, devils in the details but guess who made the details in the first place(?)
Lynn gave her friend Epstein a huge $8.5 MILLION DISCOUNT on a home for their mutual clos
(...)"Whom ever is navigating these storms and waters with us, we are aboard, and on deck, because alas~ WWG1WGA" ~R
Both are very connected to norway
Immediately after Epstein’s arrests first-in 2007 right after which again history week, several media reports emerged describing backlinks ranging from Epstein and Clinton, with many asserting they had came across shortly immediately after Clinton leftover work environment inside 2001 and you can, as has just said, issued new debatable pardon off Marc Steeped.
But not, records extracted from brand new Clinton presidential library have showed that the links anywhere between Epstein and you can Clinton date back many years before and you will were facilitated of the strong those who have largely evaded analysis when you look at the connection to your Epstein situation.
Denial reasons
NOR - No records
Lol.
https://www.archives.gov/files/foia/pra-notifications/pdf/clinton/rn-lpwjc-2016-043.pdf
(reposting this to Mr Trump).
Deputy chief counsel for the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee to Investigate Covert Arms Transactions with Iran
Scalia's most significant opinions include his lone dissent in Morrison v. Olson (arguing against the constitutionality of an Independent-Counsel law), and his majority opinions in Crawford v. Washington (defining a criminal defendant's confrontation right under the 6th Amendment) and District of Columbia v. Heller (holding that the 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees a right to individual handgun ownership).
On November 21, 1997, President Bill Clinton had signed S. 923, special legislation introduced by Senator Arlen Specter to bar McVeigh and other veterans convicted of capital crimes from being buried in any military cemetery.[93][94][95] His body was cremated at Mattox Ryan Funeral Home in Terre Haute. His ashes were given to his lawyer, who "said that the final destination of McVeigh's remains would remain privileged forever."[8]
"While visiting friends in Decker, Michigan, McVeigh reportedly complained that the Army had implanted a microchip into his buttocks so that the government could keep track of him.[1]"
An optical microcavity or microresonator is a structure formed by reflecting faces on the two sides of a spacer layer or optical medium, or by wrapping a waveguide in a circular fashion to form a ring. The former type is a standing wave cavity, and the latter is a traveling wave cavity. The name microcavity stems from the fact that it is often only a few micrometers thick, the spacer layer sometimes even in the nanometer range. As with common lasers, this forms an optical cavity or optical resonator, allowing a standing wave to form inside the spacer layer or a traveling wave that goes around in the ring.
Exploring the rheological properties of intracellular materials is essential for understanding cellular and subcellular processes. Optical traps have been widely used for physical manipulation of micro and nano objects within fluids enabling studies of biological systems.
However, experiments remain challenging as it is unclear how the probe particle's mobility is influenced by the nearby membranes and organelles. We use liposomes (unilamellar lipid vesicles) as a simple biomimetic model of living cells, together with a trapped particle rotated by optical tweezers to study mechanical and rheological properties inside a liposome both theoretically and experimentally. Here, we demonstrate that this system has the capacity to predict the hydrodynamic interaction between three-dimensional spatial membranes and internal probe particles within submicron distances, and it has the potential to aid in the design of high resolution optical micro/nanorheology techniques to be used inside living cells.